CO₂ vs. UV Laser Engravers: Which One Should You Choose?

As laser technology becomes more accessible to crafters, small businesses, and educators, choosing the right machine is more important than ever. Two popular types — CO lasers and UV lasers — each offer distinct strengths. But when it comes to real-world use, cost-effectiveness, and material flexibility, the CO laser engraver stands out as the practical and powerful choice for most users.

OMTech will compare CO and UV laser cutters in terms of working principles, operating workflow, compatible materials, and everyday use cases — and show you why CO lasers remain the go-to solution for creators.

 

1. How Do CO and UV Laser Engravers Work?

The difference between CO and UV laser systems begins with their wavelengths, and that determines what materials they work with and how deeply they can engrave or cut.

  • CO lasers operate at a wavelength of 10.6 microns, which is strongly absorbed by organic and non-metallic materials such as wood, acrylic, leather, rubber, fabric, glass, and even certain stones. This makes them ideal for cutting and engraving.
  • UV lasers run at a much shorter wavelength of 355 nanometres, allowing them to mark delicate or heat-sensitive materials like plastics, silicon, and some coated metals — but not to cut deeply. They use a photochemical process (known as “cold marking”), producing minimal heat and highly detailed markings.

Bottom line: If you want to engrave or cut organic materials with depth and versatility, a CO laser is your best bet. For ultra-fine surface marking on delicate industrial components, UV lasers are more specialised.

 

2. Operating Differences: Which Is Easier to Use?

For most hobbyists, small studios, or schools, ease of use matters just as much as technical performance.

  • CO laser engravers, like those from OMTech, are beginner-friendly with intuitive control panels and design software such as LightBurn or RDWorks. They feature accessible maintenance routines and extensive online communities for support.
  • UV laser systems, on the other hand, often involve higher technical complexity, tighter safety restrictions (due to more harmful light emissions), and less documentation for everyday users.

Winner: For accessibility and hands-on creativity, CO laser cutters are simpler to operate and maintain, especially for new users.

 

3. Material Compatibility: What Can You Cut or Engrave?

Here’s where CO laser engravers really shine.

Material Type

CO Laser

UV Laser

Wood

Yes (cut & engrave)

No

Acrylic

Yes

Limited (no cutting)

Leather/Fabric

Yes

Limited

Cardboard/Paper

Yes

No

Glass

Surface mark only

Yes (precise mark)

Metal (bare)

No (requires additive)

Yes (on anodised/coated)

Plastics (PET, ABS)

Yes (with care)

Yes

While UV systems are useful for electronics, plastic marking, and barcode labelling, they are too specialised (and too expensive) for most creative or craft-focused applications.

CO lasers can cut and engrave dozens of everyday materials, making them perfect for sign-making, personalised gifts, packaging, craft art, interior design, and more.

Explore OMTech’s full range of CO laser machines here.

 

4. Why the CO2 Laser Remains a Fair Dinkum Favourite: Its Key Advantages

While UV lasers are impressive specialists, CO2 lasers hold some strong advantages that keep them incredibly popular in Aussie workshops, studios, and factories:

Ÿ   Material Versatility & Breadth: This is the big one. A CO2 laser handles the vast majority of common engraving and cutting materials found in general manufacturing, signage, craft, and prototyping – wood, acrylic, leather, rubber, fabrics, paper products, etc. It's a true all-rounder.

Ÿ   Cost-Effectiveness (Machine & Running): Generally, CO2 laser systems offer a lower upfront cost per watt of power compared to UV lasers. The consumables (like the CO2 gas laser tube) are also typically less expensive to replace than UV laser sources.

Ÿ   Thicker Material Cutting: CO2 lasers, especially higher-powered models (e.g., 60W, 100W+), excel at cutting through thicker sections of materials like acrylic and wood. UV lasers primarily mark the surface or cut fragile films.

Ÿ   Processing Speed (for Compatible Materials): When working on the materials it loves, a CO2 laser can engrave and cut significantly faster than a UV laser of comparable power/cost. This boosts productivity for high-volume jobs.

Ÿ   Established Technology & Support: CO2 laser technology is mature and widely understood. Finding technicians familiar with them, sourcing parts, and getting support in Australia is generally easier and potentially more cost-effective than for the newer UV systems.

Ÿ   Better for Deep Engraving: If you need deep, tactile engraving (like in timber signage or 3D reliefs), CO2 lasers are far more efficient and effective than UV lasers.

5. Which One Should You Choose?

If you’re a:

  • Crafter
  • Small business
  • Design studio
  • Educator or school
  • DIY enthusiast

Then a CO laser cutter is your most reliable and cost-effective choice.

Unless your work involves high-precision component marking on sensitive surfaces, a UV laser system may be overkill in terms of cost and complexity.

 

Conclusion: CO Lasers Win on Value, Versatility, and Usability

While UV lasers serve a valuable niche, CO lasers remain the workhorse of the laser world. From hobbyists and side hustlers to schools and startups, CO engravers offer the perfect mix of cutting power, engraving detail, and material flexibility — all without breaking the bank.

Ready to get started? Explore the full lineup of OMTech CO laser machines and find your ideal model today.


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.